[home][rumors and news][model release matrix][dealer network][desktop calendar][exhaust notes][tov forums][links][search][sponsors][garage][login]

Tire Rack Upgrade Garage
 Search for a Dealer:
 Canadian Flag US Flag
 Honda Acura
 ZIP  
Team Honda Research wins ST2 at NASA Nationals with their NC1 NSX
More.......................
Acura releases details on refreshed 2019 ILX
More.......................
2019 Accord loses EX-L Navi and 1.5T Touring trims
More.......................
American Honda Reports August Sales Increase as Trucks Smash Previous Records
More.......................
2019 NSX Debuts in Monterey with Design Updates, Chassis Enhancements and Expanded Color Palette
More.......................
2019 Civic trim change summary
More.......................
Honda announces changes for 2019 Civic, including new Sport trim
More.......................
When is the 2019 Accord arriving in showrooms? Maybe not until 2019
More.......................
Civic --> Re: 2019 Civic Interior first picture
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: C&D Lightning Lap 2018
Join Discussion......
Accord --> Re: Looking at a 2018 Accord Sport!
Join Discussion......
Photoshops --> Re: Honda URB
Join Discussion......
Type R --> Re: '19 Variations on the CTR?
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: Toyota Supra - First Drive
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: A big finger to handbrake turns
Join Discussion......
Accord --> Re: 10th generation Accord Mk2 - niggles fixed with minor tweaks!
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Ford "pulls an Acura" in their latest commercial
Join Discussion......
CR-Z --> Re: Honda's Biggest Mistake? Why Now Is The Time To Buy The Misunderstood CR-Z
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Mazda CX-5 to get 2.5 Turbo Engine?
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Aragon MotoGP Spoiler
Join Discussion......
Type R --> Re: Custom Paint Job Civic Type R
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Honda Inspire test drive video
Join Discussion......
Videos --> Re: 2018 Acura NSX Review - The Best Everyday Supercar
Join Discussion......
First Drive: 2019 Honda Insight
Read Article....................
2019 Honda Insight PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................
First Drive: 2019 Acura RDX
Read Article....................
2019 Acura RDX Features & Specifications
Read Article....................
PR Photo Gallery - 2019 Acura RDX Advance
Read Article....................
PR Photo Gallery - 2019 Acura RDX A-Spec
Read Article....................

[fancy] [flat] [simple]
  TOV News > All-New 2014 Acura RLX Employs an Array of New Signature Acura Technologies to Deliver a New Level > > Re: Performance #s

Viewing Threshold (What is this?)

Thread Page - [1]
Author
    
TSX69
Profile for TSX69
Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-15-2013 09:45
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Car & Driver
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 5.9 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 15.9 sec
Standing -mile: 14.5 sec
Top speed: 135 mph

MarkR
Profile for MarkR
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-15-2013 10:40
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
TSX69 wrote:
Car & Driver
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 5.9 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 15.9 sec
Standing -mile: 14.5 sec
Top speed: 135 mph



I guess that means 0-100km/h in approx 6.1, which is not bad at all, very much Ok and quite enough! I would be happy (if I was in the market for such a large car)

Midi_Amp
Profile for Midi_Amp
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-15-2013 10:48
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Is the estimate number from C/D or from Acura? 5.9 sec acceleration is very healthy indeed. The Lexus LS 460 F-Sport 0-60 time is 5.2 with the burly V8, can the SH^2-AWD match it? Honda did boast the system achieves V8 acceleration time.

As is the car is good enough, but the RLX Hybrid will be the key. Acura should call it the Grand Hybrid Sedan or some crazy marketing spin.

The Legend
Profile for The Legend
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-15-2013 10:53
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Isnt accord 6-6 sedan still quicker from 0 to 60?
6SPDTL
Profile for 6SPDTL
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-15-2013 11:31
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Absolutely correct. This car is still too slow to impress anyone. Having owned the previous version, I hope this one is more tossable, quieter and has better brakes. The biggest demerits of the previous version was that the power was underwhelming the ride wasnt luxurious and that though SHAWD made the car handle better it really didnt make it much fun to drive since jamming the accelerator while taking a curve isnt a very natural way to drive day to day. Ill wait till I can drive one.
JDMImport
Profile for JDMImport
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-15-2013 12:07
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
The big question is, will it sell??

I like the amount of technology that is in it, but the overall design (interior and exterior) leave a lot to be desired. The exterior is very understated and borderline boring. I like the Jewel Eye lights, but the rest of the front end is so generic.

The interior is not cohesive at all. It's very busy with many curves and color combinations. It's same ol' Acura if you ask me because it is too much like a Honda. Not enough to differentiate between an Accord.

So, is this car a disappointment or is the Accord an over achiever? I say the latter.

Hondarulez
Profile for Hondarulez
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-15-2013 12:28
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Those are just estimates from Car and Driver, not actual figures. I'd wait for road tests before judging.

With that said, assuming 0-60mph in 5.9s and 1/4 mile in 14.5s, that would be on par with most other ~300hp level competitors, if not a tiny bit slower.

I think the RLX should match the Accord's numbers (0-60mph 5.6s and 1/4 mile in 14.1s) and those numbers would be highly competitive.


Mikeydred
Profile for Mikeydred
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-15-2013 13:52
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
6SPDTL wrote:
Absolutely correct. This car is still too slow to impress anyone. Having owned the previous version, I hope this one is more tossable, quieter and has better brakes. The biggest demerits of the previous version was that the power was underwhelming the ride wasnt luxurious and that though SHAWD made the car handle better it really didnt make it much fun to drive since jamming the accelerator while taking a curve isnt a very natural way to drive day to day. Ill wait till I can drive one.

That's how I take my off ramps and I love it! Of course I end up chickening out and never feel all the potential, but I love seeing the cars behind me get left in the dust.

sadlerau
Profile for sadlerau
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-16-2013 00:33
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Mikeydred wrote:
That's how I take my off ramps and I love it! Of course I end up chickening out and never feel all the potential, but I love seeing the cars behind me get left in the dust.


Did that once, back in '06, on a race track, and it was fun to see mid level race cars running wide of the line, as they tried to hold onto the tail of the Legend! At the time my thoughts were WOW, this car can handle! Up to a point.

Colin
Profile for Colin
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-16-2013 01:00
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
http://youtu.be/wLLZQYW3Ig8
This is my hand timed run on the dragstrip. Keep in mind that there are 4 guys in the car so its quite a bit heavier than a typical C&D test (driver and test equipment). Also seem to be "slightly" traction limited... LOL. But I did like how the Traction Control didn't bog down the engine.

TSX69
Profile for TSX69
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-20-2013 06:21
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/track-tests/2014-acura-rlx-track-test.html
Acceleration
0-30 (sec): 2.7 (2.8 w/ TC on)
0-45 (sec): 4.4 (4.5 w/ TC on)
0-60 (sec): 6.5 (6.6 w/ TC on)
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec): 6.2 (6.3 w/ TC on)
0-75 (sec): 9.0 (9.2 w/ TC on)
1/4-Mile (sec @ mph): 14.6 @ 97.1 (14.7 @ 96.8 w/ TC on)

Braking
30-0 (ft): 30
60-0 (ft): 120

Handling
Slalom (mph): 63.3 (ESC Sport)/62.7 (ESC Normal)
Skid Pad Lateral Acceleration (g): 0.82 (Sport)/0.81 (Normal)

Db @ Idle: 39.0
Db @ Full Throttle: 70.8
Db @ 70-mph Cruise: 60.3

RPM @ 70: 2,150

MarkR
Profile for MarkR
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-20-2013 07:27
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Guess 6.5, 0-60 will turn into 6.9 0-100km/h

Not fast but very much Ok. Too bad it looks like a Hyundai trying to be sober enough for the Chinese government :-)

M-Sport BMW or royal RLX anyone? Not to make it unfair you can put sport and wood trim stickers on the RLX in true Honda fashion.

F148VR
Profile for F148VR
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-20-2013 10:15
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I think these numbers are plenty good for the intended buyers that RLX is targeting. Keep in mind this is the base RLX power package, and I seriously doubt someone shopping at this tier is going to hinge their buying decision on few tenth of a second difference in 0-60 time.

notyper
Profile for notyper
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-20-2013 11:26
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Here are Edmunds #'s for the V6 6AT Accord.

0-30: 2.5
0-45: 4.1
0-60: 6.1
0-60 with 1 ft rollout: 5.7
0-75: 8.6
1/4 mile: 14.4 @ 98.1

Braking
30-0: 33
60-0: 128

Handling
Slalom: 63.5
Skidpad: 0.82

Surprising that the Accord, with 30mm narrower tires, gets off the line harder. The 1/4 mile trap speeds would indicate that the RL is making about 8-9% more power at the wheels. Call it 265 whp on Jeff's local dynojet. However, the RL is running tighter gear ratios - up to 10% tighter in 2nd-4th. That would help acceleration notably, so power might be a bit lower. I'd _guess_ that the actual test will show 255-260 whp on Jeff's local dynojet. Not quite as underrated as the Accord 6AT, but still solid. If it makes more, even better.

By comparison, the twin turbo N55 from BMW usually puts down about 270-275 whp with an auto and it is very underrated (although not as much as the old N54 was, and the new N55 seems very susceptible to fuel quality and temp changes too).

sadlerau
Profile for sadlerau
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-20-2013 11:33
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
notyper wrote:

Surprising that the Accord, with 30mm narrower tires, gets off the line harder.



Inertia mate :)

Also perhaps the softer suspension overcomes the longer wheelbase advantage the RLX would have.

Hondarulez
Profile for Hondarulez
Re: Performance #s [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 02-20-2013 13:48
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
It's interesting to see Edmunds got a trap speed of 98mph in the Accord V6 while others like C&D and MT are getting 100+mph.

I think we might see ~100mph in the RLX from the other magazines.

It's also interesting to see that the RLX has a noticeably higher trap speed than the 535i according to Edmunds (97mph vs 95mph).

We know that the Accord V6 comes with 17" rims, while the RLX model that was tested had 19" wheels. Perhaps this could slow the RLX a bit.


 
Thread Page - [1]
Contact TOV | Submit Your Article | Submit Your Link | Advertise | TOV Shop | Events | Our Sponsors | TOV Archives
Copyright © 2018 Velocitech Inc. All information contained herein remains the property of Velocitech Inc.
The Temple of VTEC is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. TOV Policies and Guidelines - Credits - Privacy Policy
29 mobile: 0