[home][rumors and news][model release matrix][dealer network][desktop calendar][exhaust notes][tov forums][links][search][sponsors][garage][login]

Tire Rack Upgrade Garage
 Search for a Dealer:
 Canadian Flag US Flag
 Honda Acura
 ZIP  
Honda to Participate in the FIA Formula One World Championship
More.......................
Sources: Announcement of Honda's F1 Return is Imminent
More.......................
NSX Project Update, Conference Call Notes
More.......................
Acura NSX Production Site Selected in Ohio
More.......................
2014 Acura ILX Luxury Sports Sedan Arrives With Host of New Standard Features...
More.......................
Spring Cleaning: What's in store for model year 2014? Part I - Acura
More.......................
Production of 2014 Acura MDX Begins in Alabama
More.......................
Honda April Sales Up on CR-V Monthly Sales Record; All-New RLX Flagship Sedan Bolsters Acura Sales
More.......................
General Talk --> Re: My Thoughts On The NSX
Join Discussion......
ILX --> Re: 1st Generation ILX Reviews
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Whats the plan for Accord in EU?
Join Discussion......
CR-V --> Re: New 2014 Subaru Forester is Consumer Report's top-scoring small SUV
Join Discussion......
CR-Z --> Re: New total output + World debut
Join Discussion......
Accord --> Re: 2013 Accord front license plate bracket(holes in front bumper)
Join Discussion......
Civic --> Re: Nurburgring lap times
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: 2014 Silverado mileage
Join Discussion......
NSX --> Re: Porsche 918 First Drive video from Chris Harris
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: S2000/FRS/RX8 review - Brings a proud but sad tear to my eye
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: start-stop technology in Honda?
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: Volvo plugin wagon sells better than expected...
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Mclaren Honda Collaboration
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Announcements from HPD? What about?
Join Discussion......
NSX --> Re: NSX Testing
Join Discussion......
TOV Video: 2014 Acura MDX Walkaround at 2013 NYIAS
Read Article....................
TOV Photo Gallery: 2014 Acura MDX
Read Article....................
2014 Acura MDX PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................
TOV Dyno Test: 2013 Accord EX 6MT
Read Article....................
TOV Video: 2014 RLX on an autocross run
Read Article....................
TOV Dyno Test: 2013 Accord V6 EX-L 6MT Coupe
Read Article....................



[fancy] [flat] [simple]
TOV Forums > Today's Reading Links > > Re: US Sets Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards

Go to:

Viewing Threshold (What is this?)

Thread Page - [1]
Author
  Post New Thread
nyt_reader
Profile for nyt_reader
US Sets Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards    (Score: 1, Normal) 08-29-2012 10:12
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Achieving American energy independence with the help of fuel efficient cars... "The magic hand of the market" will be late to the American party, but it will come into play through corporate competition in achieving these standards. Better late than never!

NYT, Wednesday August 20, 2012
"The new rules represent a victory for environmentalists and advocates of fuel conservation, but were attacked by opponents, including the Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, as too costly for consumers."

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/29/business/energy-environment/obama-unveils-tighter-fuel-efficiency-standards.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120829
notyper
Profile for notyper
Re: US Sets Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards    (Score: 1, Normal) 08-29-2012 12:21
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Hopefully the EPA and CAFE will be brought to heel come 2013. They're simply out of control.

Your statement about the magic hand of the market is off-base. Mandating more fuel efficient new cars is simply going to force more people in the lower half of the income tables to retain old cars longer. The actual effect on net energy consumption in this country will be very, very small.

Something environmentalists rarely consider is unintended consequences. In part because they don't understand markets.

SC
Power Of Dreams
Profile for Power Of Dreams
Re: US Sets Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards    (Score: 1, Normal) 08-29-2012 14:32
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Seriously, if they want higher fuel economy, lessen the safety standards.

If people can buy motorcycles, why can't they buy cars like a new 1992 Civic VX (with an updated powertrain to meet current emission standards) that's lighter and more fuel efficient?

Obviously, I wouldn't be shuttling my family in one, but I'd take the risk.
Gfn8r
Profile for Gfn8r
Re: US Sets Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards    (Score: 1, Normal) 08-31-2012 09:47
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Power Of Dreams wrote:
Seriously, if they want higher fuel economy, lessen the safety standards.

If people can buy motorcycles, why can't they buy cars like a new 1992 Civic VX (with an updated powertrain to meet current emission standards) that's lighter and more fuel efficient?

Obviously, I wouldn't be shuttling my family in one, but I'd take the risk.



While I agree with your statement, I think of the Top Gear video of the T-Bone between the Isuzu SUV (don't recall the name off-hand, either here in the US OR in the UK) and the Civic Sedan of that generation--the driver would have been toast! I thought they did a similar video of a more modern car (Renault Clio, I think), and that one came out much better!

Airbags are good and light weight--if stuff like high-strength steel didn't add weight, and carbon-fiber wasn't so expensive, you could have the ideal.

(As always, correct me if I'm wrong! ;-) )
FiSH-Chan
Profile for FiSH-Chan
Re: US Sets Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards    (Score: 1, Normal) 08-31-2012 23:42
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Power Of Dreams wrote:

Obviously, I wouldn't be shuttling my family in one,


This is the problem. Only one time a driver needs it and it will be between life and death, like that time the container tip onto the CRV will justify all the disadvantage of that for that guy it unfortunately. Since they are focus on reducing weight and adding stronger steel then we see how the new generation of cars are.. they need to come up with a good balance.


iutodd
Profile for iutodd
Re: US Sets Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards    (Score: 1, Normal) 09-01-2012 02:07
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
notyper wrote:
Hopefully the EPA and CAFE will be brought to heel come 2013. They're simply out of control.

Your statement about the magic hand of the market is off-base. Mandating more fuel efficient new cars is simply going to force more people in the lower half of the income tables to retain old cars longer. The actual effect on net energy consumption in this country will be very, very small.

Something environmentalists rarely consider is unintended consequences. In part because they don't understand markets.

SC



I think the auto industry is just catching up to itself. The CAFE standards didn't change FOR 20 YEARS (from 1990-2010) so now they are finally going somewhere. God forbid car companies actually have to try to make well-engineered, fuel efficient cars (which some companies basically fought for the entirety of that 20 years (and well before) but now they have no choice and I think that's a good thing).

The average age of cars on the road is already pretty high - but that might also have something to do with the recession, the absolute collapse of the auto industry (17 million cars a year peak to 10 million cars a year two years later), tight credit markets and continued high unemployment/underemployment as opposed to (the already raised) fuel economy standards. If the global economy doesn't get better then these kinds of things might continue - but car sales are on track to be as good as they've been since the Lehman Brothers collapse so maybe they won't.

The article says that the price increases because of the increased costs due to better fuel economy would shut 7 million more people out of the car market. The Prius C starts at $19K and gets 50 mpg. There are all sorts of models you can buy in Europe that get 50 mpg (Euro spec anyway) for less money than that. I am not saying that I want our country to be full of Polos and Priuses...but if Full-Size V8 SUVs go away I won't exactly be sad...and if you're spending less than $19K that's (a Polo/Fit/Sonic/Accent) what you're going to buy anyway.

Already, in the last 5 years we've gone from mid-size cars (like the Accord) getting 31 mpg highway and that being OK, to the new Altima getting 38 mpg highway and by GOD the Accord better beat that shit. That's a 22% increase in expectations in just 5 years. Obviously to continue at that pace might be impossible - but let's say that every 5 years the Accord can gains mpgs at half that rate - 11% (because we all know that Honda will forever dissapoint us). In 2017 we will expect the Accord (or some other mid-size competitor) to get 42 mpg highway, in 2022 it will get 47, and in 2027 it will get 52 mpg highway. I don't know if those numbers are even possible with internal combustion engines alone but, 5 years ago, did 38 mpg in an Altima seem possible?
P54
Profile for P54
Re: US Sets Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards    (Score: 1, Normal) 09-01-2012 08:49
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
iutodd wrote:
notyper wrote:
Hopefully the EPA and CAFE will be brought to heel come 2013. They're simply out of control.

Your statement about the magic hand of the market is off-base. Mandating more fuel efficient new cars is simply going to force more people in the lower half of the income tables to retain old cars longer. The actual effect on net energy consumption in this country will be very, very small.

Something environmentalists rarely consider is unintended consequences. In part because they don't understand markets.

SC



I think the auto industry is just catching up to itself. The CAFE standards didn't change FOR 20 YEARS (from 1990-2010) so now they are finally going somewhere. God forbid car companies actually have to try to make well-engineered, fuel efficient cars (which some companies basically fought for the entirety of that 20 years (and well before) but now they have no choice and I think that's a good thing).

The average age of cars on the road is already pretty high - but that might also have something to do with the recession, the absolute collapse of the auto industry (17 million cars a year peak to 10 million cars a year two years later), tight credit markets and continued high unemployment/underemployment as opposed to (the already raised) fuel economy standards. If the global economy doesn't get better then these kinds of things might continue - but car sales are on track to be as good as they've been since the Lehman Brothers collapse so maybe they won't.

The article says that the price increases because of the increased costs due to better fuel economy would shut 7 million more people out of the car market. The Prius C starts at $19K and gets 50 mpg. There are all sorts of models you can buy in Europe that get 50 mpg (Euro spec anyway) for less money than that. I am not saying that I want our country to be full of Polos and Priuses...but if Full-Size V8 SUVs go away I won't exactly be sad...and if you're spending less than $19K that's (a Polo/Fit/Sonic/Accent) what you're going to buy anyway.

Already, in the last 5 years we've gone from mid-size cars (like the Accord) getting 31 mpg highway and that being OK, to the new Altima getting 38 mpg highway and by GOD the Accord better beat that shit. That's a 22% increase in expectations in just 5 years. Obviously to continue at that pace might be impossible - but let's say that every 5 years the Accord can gains mpgs at half that rate - 11% (because we all know that Honda will forever dissapoint us). In 2017 we will expect the Accord (or some other mid-size competitor) to get 42 mpg highway, in 2022 it will get 47, and in 2027 it will get 52 mpg highway. I don't know if those numbers are even possible with internal combustion engines alone but, 5 years ago, did 38 mpg in an Altima seem possible?




The current Accord gets 34 mpg doesn't it? So the new Altima improved that by about 9%. I would think the '13 Accord with ED engine and CVT should be able to beat that 37mpg figure easily and in real life in certain trim would return the 42 mpg you proposed for 2017, not EPA but in actual life with broke in engine.
 
Thread Page - [1]
Go to:
Contact TOV | Submit Your Article | Submit Your Link | Advertise | TOV Shop | Events | Our Sponsors | TOV Archives
Copyright © 2012 Velocitech Inc. All information contained herein remains the property of Velocitech Inc.
The Temple of VTEC is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. TOV Policies and Guidelines - Credits - Privacy Policy