NSXman
 |
|
|
Sounds a bit oxymoron-ish.
|
VTECRacer
 |
|
|
Makes sense to me. It's nearly identical (mechanically), but retuned extensively (ECU + CVT).
|
NSXman
 |
|
|
That may be what is meant, but it isn't what was said. Just saying the 4 words just sounds like an oxymoron. Agree to disagree.
|
VTECRacer
 |
|
|
Different levels of reading comprehension I guess.
|
NSXman
 |
|
|
I suppose. Funny, I think we can both spell arrogant and jerk pretty good though.
|
owequitit
 |
|
NSXman wrote:
Sounds a bit oxymoron-ish.
|
Not really. Tuning is vaporware. They can have something that is nearly identical mechanically, but is wholly different from a tuning/use perspective. Increased battery boost, different engine mapping, different gearing etc. All things that they frequently change anyway, without actually changing any of the expensive stuff.
|
NSXman
 |
|
owequitit wrote:
NSXman wrote:
Sounds a bit oxymoron-ish.
|
Not really. Tuning is vaporware. They can have something that is nearly identical mechanically, but is wholly different from a tuning/use perspective. Increased battery boost, different engine mapping, different gearing etc. All things that they frequently change anyway, without actually changing any of the expensive stuff.
|
Yeah, I pretty much understand that. I just thought the wording sounded funny. To me identical means swappable.
Despite what you want to say, retuning can also be mechanical.
|
Ganplosive
 |
|
|
it's ok NSXman, I feel you
|
VTECRacer
 |
|
NSXman wrote:
I suppose. Funny, I think we can both spell arrogant and jerk pretty good though.
|
That would be spelling though, not reading comprehension ;)
|
Torque
 |
|
Ganplosive wrote:
it's ok NSXman, I feel you
|
Or what he's really trying to say is he would like to feel you with his crusty and calloused over hands.
|
Ganplosive
 |
|
Torque's just raging because I didn't believe his claims on the internet. I mean how dare anyone question his authority on all that is online, his name is freakin torque for fucks sake.
*rolls eyes
YOU MAD BRO? AY WHY YOU MAD THOUGH?
|
Torque
 |
|
Ganplosive wrote:
Torque's just raging because I didn't believe his claims on the internet. I mean how dare anyone question his authority on all that is online, his name is freakin torque for fucks sake.
*rolls eyes
YOU MAD BRO? AY WHY YOU MAD THOUGH?
|
No worries bro, I "feel" you.
|
Ganplosive
 |
|
|
thanks! and I FEEL YOU TOO~~~!
|
Kool Aid
 |
|
|
Remember the uproar when the preliminary EPA numbers were released? 35 city and 38 highway if I recall. People here had a conniption because the Civic is 44/44. I think this information about 'retuning' may be the first indication why there is such a difference between the two cars.
|
Ganplosive
 |
|
|
I'm thinking performance at the cost of economy. I hope to god I'm somewhere in the ball park though hahah
|
Kool Aid
 |
|
Ganplosive wrote:
I'm thinking performance at the cost of economy. I hope to god I'm somewhere in the ball park though hahah
|
I think you need to put 'performance' in quotes...
|
Ganplosive
 |
|
|
oh come on man, this is TOV, when I say performance everyone knows I'm talking about 0-60 in 2.5 seconds and 2g laterals on autocross
|
|
|
| |